Comments on: Senate 2006 http://moorethoughts.com/2005/12/30/senate-2006-2/ Conservatism, Freedom, Capitalism Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:26:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: vbalkixlg http://moorethoughts.com/2005/12/30/senate-2006-2/#comment-26079 vbalkixlg Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:23:20 +0000 http://moorethoughts.com/2005/12/30/senate-2006-2/#comment-26079 <strong>zgpqdlkjlbw</strong> lhlvjfxha cezsk fengnxacf zgpqdlkjlbw

lhlvjfxha cezsk fengnxacf

]]> By: bartlett http://moorethoughts.com/2005/12/30/senate-2006-2/#comment-1026 bartlett Tue, 03 Jan 2006 05:52:27 +0000 http://moorethoughts.com/2005/12/30/senate-2006-2/#comment-1026 OK, other than what Bob Corker says, do you have any actual evidence? OK, other than what Bob Corker says, do you have any actual evidence?

]]> By: G http://moorethoughts.com/2005/12/30/senate-2006-2/#comment-1023 G Mon, 02 Jan 2006 23:10:26 +0000 http://moorethoughts.com/2005/12/30/senate-2006-2/#comment-1023 Howdy y'all. With all due respect to these other folks running for office, the candidate who's REALLY conservative - and who has actually articulated specific policy ideas that go beyond the usual "traditional conservative values" rubric - is Bo Heyward. Check out his website at www.boforsenate.com. Howdy y’all.

With all due respect to these other folks running for office, the candidate who’s REALLY conservative - and who has actually articulated specific policy ideas that go beyond the usual “traditional conservative values” rubric - is Bo Heyward. Check out his website at http://www.boforsenate.com.

]]> By: Chris http://moorethoughts.com/2005/12/30/senate-2006-2/#comment-1019 Chris Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:59:31 +0000 http://moorethoughts.com/2005/12/30/senate-2006-2/#comment-1019 I'm with you Nathan...the burden is on those who say Bob Corker is against families, guns and good law to prove it with credible evidence. I've publicly heard Bob Corker discuss his support for judges that uphold the law as well as his views on gun rights and family values (very conservative). Happy New Year to you and your family I’m with you Nathan…the burden is on those who say Bob Corker is against families, guns and good law to prove it with credible evidence. I’ve publicly heard Bob Corker discuss his support for judges that uphold the law as well as his views on gun rights and family values (very conservative).

Happy New Year to you and your family

]]> By: bartlett http://moorethoughts.com/2005/12/30/senate-2006-2/#comment-1012 bartlett Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:26:39 +0000 http://moorethoughts.com/2005/12/30/senate-2006-2/#comment-1012 "I would certainly like to see what one would consider evidence that Bob Corker isn’t a conservative on any of those issues [gun rights, family values, appointment of judges]." May I turn the tables and ask what evidence there is that Corker IS a conservative on those issues? “I would certainly like to see what one would consider evidence that Bob Corker isn’t a conservative on any of those issues [gun rights, family values, appointment of judges].”

May I turn the tables and ask what evidence there is that Corker IS a conservative on those issues?

]]> By: JB http://moorethoughts.com/2005/12/30/senate-2006-2/#comment-1010 JB Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:17:58 +0000 http://moorethoughts.com/2005/12/30/senate-2006-2/#comment-1010 "Bryant said he is consistently pushing what separates himself from Hilleary and Corker - the appointment of federal judges, gun rights and traditional family values." I don't think that's a direct quote from Ed, just what the reporter wrote. Ed's been making the case that what differentiates him from Van/Corker is his qualifications. All the candidates talk about judges/gun rights/family values, but with Ed's background as an Army JAG officer, professor of constitutional law at West Point, federal prosecutor and serving on the House Judiciary cmte - he's in the best position to get a seat on the Senate Judiciary cmte. where he can actually make a difference on the issues conservatives care about. Ed won't just be another vote like Van/Corker, he'll immediately make an impact in the U.S. Senate. “Bryant said he is consistently pushing what separates himself from Hilleary and Corker - the appointment of federal judges, gun rights and traditional family values.”

I don’t think that’s a direct quote from Ed, just what the reporter wrote. Ed’s been making the case that what differentiates him from Van/Corker is his qualifications. All the candidates talk about judges/gun rights/family values, but with Ed’s background as an Army JAG officer, professor of constitutional law at West Point, federal prosecutor and serving on the House Judiciary cmte - he’s in the best position to get a seat on the Senate Judiciary cmte. where he can actually make a difference on the issues conservatives care about. Ed won’t just be another vote like Van/Corker, he’ll immediately make an impact in the U.S. Senate.

]]>