MooreThoughts.com

Nathan Moore's Thoughts

Just in Case…

you missed it, Bill Hobbs is now back, fully blogging again at BillHobbs.com. Of particular note is the continuing TEA involvement in attacking SJR 629

The TEA Legislative Report editor then goes on to say the TEA has “no intention of entering into a running debate on this issue.”

I thought the TEA - which describes itself on its website as “an organization that advocates learning without limits,” would not seek to limit what its members might learn about Senate Joint Resolution 629, and might actually favor the free and open exchange of ideas and points of view on the issue. But I was mistaken - apparently the TEA prefers merely to lecture its members with a one-sided and inaccurate message and then shut down debate.

The TEA is, as mentioned many times on this blog, a union. It is not comprised of a bunch of teachers wanting to ensure the best possible education of students. It is comprised of quasi-Teamsters working to ensure there is no other possible education for students but public education, and by public, meaning that every negative aspect of an inefficient government bureaucracy be expanded and embraced. Fewer students mean less teacher members, which means less power.
As for TEA inaccuracy and uninterest in debate, I’m hardly surprised. The last thing the TEA may be is a First Amendment organization. The attack of the TEA on Bill Hobbs was a bit surprising, though. The TEA piles on, and Hobbs has become the official whipping boy of conservative blogdom. I suppose from the TEA’s perspective it’s better than actually defending indefensible ideas.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • description
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • Blogosphere News

3 Responses to “Just in Case…”

  1. Bill Hobbs Says:

    By attacking me, they just alerted their membership to the existence of my blog, which inures to my benefit not their’s.

  2. brittney Says:

    You have mentioned this attack on you several places. What part of the TEA report was an attack?

  3. George Rand Says:

    Brittney, did you read it? How about “relatively obscure ‘blogger’” and “the editor of this Report does not have the time certain ‘bloggers’ apparently have to sit around and act philosophic”

Leave a Reply