<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rudy is Right - They&#8217;ll Lose the War to Win the Election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: patriotactor</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-155453</link>
		<dc:creator>patriotactor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-155453</guid>
		<description>http://www.911reasons.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.911reasons.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.911reasons.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan A. Moore</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-108303</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan A. Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-108303</guid>
		<description>This other Nathan Moore is right on the money! To the Democrats it is more important to be in control and turn the attention of Americans to domestic policy. That want to get back to the US before 9/11. That place is gone, the quicker everyone accepts this the quicker we can facilitate victory on all Fronts. From my foxhole in Iraq, it feels as though the left is the first weakness. Its the weak knee in our defense. If we return to pre-9/11 thought, "GWOT is a matter of policing not attacking" we will face a fate worse than 9/11. Its coming and our enemies are pursuing this! Don't let them abandon these people here, that suffer everyday, that long for US support and a world without the Jihad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This other Nathan Moore is right on the money! To the Democrats it is more important to be in control and turn the attention of Americans to domestic policy. That want to get back to the US before 9/11. That place is gone, the quicker everyone accepts this the quicker we can facilitate victory on all Fronts. From my foxhole in Iraq, it feels as though the left is the first weakness. Its the weak knee in our defense. If we return to pre-9/11 thought, &#8220;GWOT is a matter of policing not attacking&#8221; we will face a fate worse than 9/11. Its coming and our enemies are pursuing this! Don&#8217;t let them abandon these people here, that suffer everyday, that long for US support and a world without the Jihad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-97005</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-97005</guid>
		<description>“What Harry Reid is saying is that this war is lost — in other words, a war where we mainly spend our time policing a civil war between Shiites and Sunnis. We are not going to solve that problem. … The war is not lost. And Harry Reid believes this — we Democrats believe it. … So the bottom line is if the war continues on this path, if we continue to try to police and settle a civil war that’s been going on for hundreds of years in Iraq, we can’t win. But on the other hand, if we change the mission and have that mission focus on the more narrow goal of counterterrorism, we sure can win.”
- SEN Chuck Schumer

Everyone got that? This war is lost. But the war against terror can be won.  America will be defended, not by a bumbling fear mongering Republican administration whose leaders Bush and Cheney cowardly avoided Vietnam service, but by  great American minds that will strategically use the American military to our greatest advantage and not piss it away in a civil war created through Republican incompetence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“What Harry Reid is saying is that this war is lost — in other words, a war where we mainly spend our time policing a civil war between Shiites and Sunnis. We are not going to solve that problem. … The war is not lost. And Harry Reid believes this — we Democrats believe it. … So the bottom line is if the war continues on this path, if we continue to try to police and settle a civil war that’s been going on for hundreds of years in Iraq, we can’t win. But on the other hand, if we change the mission and have that mission focus on the more narrow goal of counterterrorism, we sure can win.”<br />
- SEN Chuck Schumer</p>
<p>Everyone got that? This war is lost. But the war against terror can be won.  America will be defended, not by a bumbling fear mongering Republican administration whose leaders Bush and Cheney cowardly avoided Vietnam service, but by  great American minds that will strategically use the American military to our greatest advantage and not piss it away in a civil war created through Republican incompetence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-96996</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-96996</guid>
		<description>It's not Americans and the United States Congress who are emboldening the enemy, it's the failed policy of this president, going to war without a strategy, going to war prematurely, going to war without enough troops, going to war without enough equipment... and Republicans have the balls to call Democrats the losers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not Americans and the United States Congress who are emboldening the enemy, it&#8217;s the failed policy of this president, going to war without a strategy, going to war prematurely, going to war without enough troops, going to war without enough equipment&#8230; and Republicans have the balls to call Democrats the losers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ann</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-96957</link>
		<dc:creator>ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-96957</guid>
		<description>...and who is raising the white flag??

Right it's the DEMOCRAT LOSERS!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and who is raising the white flag??</p>
<p>Right it&#8217;s the DEMOCRAT LOSERS!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-96953</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-96953</guid>
		<description>How could it be true, that the man who was president during the worst attack on our nation, and the man who was the mayor of the city in which that attack principally unfolded, would not only be absolved of any and all blame for the unreadiness of their own governments, but, more over, would thereafter be branded heroes of those attacks?

We Americans are sick to death, of you and the other terror-mongers, trying to frighten us into submission, into the surrender of our rights and our reason, into this betrayal of that for which this country has always stood.

We have nothing to fear but fear itself and those who would exploit our fear, for power, and for their own personal, selfish gain.

On what imaginary track record does Mr. Giuliani base his boast?

Which party held the presidency on September 11th, 2001, Mr. Giuliani?

Which party held the mayoralty of New York on that date, Mr. Giuliani?

Which party assured New Yorkers that the air was safe, and the remains of the dead, recovered - and not being used to fill pot-holes, Mr. Giuliani?

Which party wanted what the terrorists wanted - the postponement elections - and to whose personal advantage would that have redounded, Mr. Giuliani?

Which mayor of New York was elected eight months after the first attack on the World Trade Center, yet did not emphasize counter-terror in the same city for the next eight years, Mr. Giuliani?

Which party had proposed to turn over the Department of Homeland Security to Bernard Kerik, Mr. Giuliani?

Who wanted to ignore and hide Kerik's Organized Crime allegations, Mr. Giuliani?

Who personally argued to the White House that Kerik need not be vetted, Mr. Giuliani?

Which party rode roughshod over Americans' rights while braying that it was actually protecting them, Mr. Giuliani?

Which party took this country into the most utterly backwards, utterly counter-productive, utterly ruinous war in our history, Mr. Giuliani?

Which party has been in office as more Americans were killed in the pointless fields of Iraq, than were killed in the consuming nightmare of 9/11, Mr. Giuliani?

He, with no foreign policy experience whatsoever, is somehow the Messiah-of-the-moment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could it be true, that the man who was president during the worst attack on our nation, and the man who was the mayor of the city in which that attack principally unfolded, would not only be absolved of any and all blame for the unreadiness of their own governments, but, more over, would thereafter be branded heroes of those attacks?</p>
<p>We Americans are sick to death, of you and the other terror-mongers, trying to frighten us into submission, into the surrender of our rights and our reason, into this betrayal of that for which this country has always stood.</p>
<p>We have nothing to fear but fear itself and those who would exploit our fear, for power, and for their own personal, selfish gain.</p>
<p>On what imaginary track record does Mr. Giuliani base his boast?</p>
<p>Which party held the presidency on September 11th, 2001, Mr. Giuliani?</p>
<p>Which party held the mayoralty of New York on that date, Mr. Giuliani?</p>
<p>Which party assured New Yorkers that the air was safe, and the remains of the dead, recovered - and not being used to fill pot-holes, Mr. Giuliani?</p>
<p>Which party wanted what the terrorists wanted - the postponement elections - and to whose personal advantage would that have redounded, Mr. Giuliani?</p>
<p>Which mayor of New York was elected eight months after the first attack on the World Trade Center, yet did not emphasize counter-terror in the same city for the next eight years, Mr. Giuliani?</p>
<p>Which party had proposed to turn over the Department of Homeland Security to Bernard Kerik, Mr. Giuliani?</p>
<p>Who wanted to ignore and hide Kerik&#8217;s Organized Crime allegations, Mr. Giuliani?</p>
<p>Who personally argued to the White House that Kerik need not be vetted, Mr. Giuliani?</p>
<p>Which party rode roughshod over Americans&#8217; rights while braying that it was actually protecting them, Mr. Giuliani?</p>
<p>Which party took this country into the most utterly backwards, utterly counter-productive, utterly ruinous war in our history, Mr. Giuliani?</p>
<p>Which party has been in office as more Americans were killed in the pointless fields of Iraq, than were killed in the consuming nightmare of 9/11, Mr. Giuliani?</p>
<p>He, with no foreign policy experience whatsoever, is somehow the Messiah-of-the-moment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Krumm &#187; If they were on al qaeda&#8217;s payroll . . .</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-96941</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Krumm &#187; If they were on al qaeda&#8217;s payroll . . .</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-96941</guid>
		<description>[...] Nathan Moore sums it up pretty well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nathan Moore sums it up pretty well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nashville is Talking &#187; Washington-Iraq War: A Round-Up</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-96825</link>
		<dc:creator>Nashville is Talking &#187; Washington-Iraq War: A Round-Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2007/04/25/rudy-is-right-theyll-lose-the-war-to-win-the-election/#comment-96825</guid>
		<description>[...] Nathan Moore: The Democrats have determined that 1) the war in Iraq is lost, and 2) we need to get out on a date certain. Forget for now what happens once we leave Iraq, or what message an outright surrender would send to those who prefer us all dead. Or how a chaotic Iraq empowers Iran, and places the world’s oil supply, and our economy and well-being, in great peril. The “get out now” crowd has clearly not thought more than one step ahead. Maybe if Harry Reid could stop focusing on how to lose a war to win an election, he would have the time to actually inform himself about the region we’ve been politically and militarily embroiled in for the last sixty years. The irresponsiblity of the Congressional leadership is sickening. The only answer is to win the war, and they ought to know it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nathan Moore: The Democrats have determined that 1) the war in Iraq is lost, and 2) we need to get out on a date certain. Forget for now what happens once we leave Iraq, or what message an outright surrender would send to those who prefer us all dead. Or how a chaotic Iraq empowers Iran, and places the world’s oil supply, and our economy and well-being, in great peril. The “get out now” crowd has clearly not thought more than one step ahead. Maybe if Harry Reid could stop focusing on how to lose a war to win an election, he would have the time to actually inform himself about the region we’ve been politically and militarily embroiled in for the last sixty years. The irresponsiblity of the Congressional leadership is sickening. The only answer is to win the war, and they ought to know it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
