Nathan Moore's Thoughts
CNN - the Cable Nimrod Network
It’s old news already. CNN has long been the extended publicity arm of the Democrat Party. Repeated questioning by Obama, Edwards and Clinton supporters at last night’s GOP debate now has the network completely disgraced.
This is not a small thing. A cub reporter with a dial-up Internet connection could have done the due diligence. Instead, the number two cable network in the world demonstrates a peculiar penchant for committing journalistic suicide
I first noticed something was amiss when one of the undecided “panel voters” was certain she would vote for John Edwards, mangled Rudy’s name, then said Edwards’ name again - puzzling, an undecided Republican voter leaning towards one of the most liberal Democrat options. When Bill Bennett disclosed who the general was live in the after-debate panel I nearly fell of the couch, and Anderson Cooper nearly fell of the stage.
Now, Michelle Malkin has aggregated the chicanery behind a slew of the questioners, all politically active and none active in anything Republican.
Either CNN is more unbiased then Fox News, or they are professional clowns. Take your pick - either way, I hope that Al Gore’s Current gets the next debate before CNN does.
November 29th, 2007 at 3:15 pm
[...] var flashObject = new FlashObject(”http://www.youtube.com/v/mhkyd4Z_EEc”,”fm_mhkyd4Z_EEc”,”425″,”350″,”6″,”",”",”",”",”"); flashObject.addParam(”wmode”, “transparent”); flashObject.write(”fo_targ_mhkyd4Z_EEc1671986249″); Nathan Moore suspects foul play: I first noticed something was amiss when one of the undecided “panel voters” was certain she would vote for John Edwards, mangled Rudy’s name, then said Edwards’ name again - puzzling, an undecided Republican voter leaning towards one of the most liberal Democrat options. When Bill Bennett disclosed who the general was live in the after-debate panel I nearly fell of the couch, and Anderson Cooper nearly fell of the stage. Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]
November 29th, 2007 at 3:19 pm
A question is a question, why does it matter who asked it? Now, when it came to giving the Brig. General the microphone, that probably went too far…but simply asking the question? I see nothing wrong with it. It was a lot better than that redneck who got to ask whether they would unequivocally oppose “amnesty” for illegal immigrants.
Frankly, I’d much rather watch a debate which had Republicans asking Democrats questions, and vice-versa, than I would a debate where a bunch of Young Goopers get on the screen and ask if Ronald Reagan was just the greatest President in history, or the second coming of Christ.
November 29th, 2007 at 3:20 pm
As for John Edwards, I’ve met a guy the other day who supported Edwards, or said he might lean towards your boy Fred…he was also convinced that Barack Obama was secretly a Muslim. I think Edwards’ populist appeal, like that of a Tancredo or even Hunter, appeals to people outside the white liberal clique.
November 29th, 2007 at 6:05 pm
Sure, an “extended publicity arm” would give the floor to Grover Norquist any day.
P.S. It’s the Democratic Party.
November 29th, 2007 at 6:35 pm
Malkin tried to discredit some, but the lady that said she was thinking John Edwards - Malkin doesn’t have any info on.
One of the others, like the Mom with her kids might be a union member/supporter/activist, but that doesn’t mean she is a supporter of Edwards specifically just because the Union endorses him.
Edwards has been leading on the issue important to most hard working americans, he is still greatly underestimated in the polls.
December 2nd, 2007 at 6:26 pm
Sean is right. If they can’t stand up to questions by Democrats, how can we expect any of themto stand up to al Qaeda?
You should tune into Fox News for more important things.
February 9th, 2008 at 8:23 pm
I have been visiting this site a lot lately, so i thought it is a good idea to show my appreciation with a comment.
Thanks,
Jim Mirkalami
PS: I am a single dad.