<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corker (and Romney) Are Right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moorethoughts.com/2008/01/31/corker-and-romney-are-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2008/01/31/corker-and-romney-are-right/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 02:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Green</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2008/01/31/corker-and-romney-are-right/#comment-195840</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2008/01/31/corker-and-romney-are-right/#comment-195840</guid>
		<description>Nathan,

First let me say that I'm supporting McCain. I think this link below to an article from the WSJ through RCP is the best summary as to why he is best in a race against the Democratic nominee. 

It gives, in my opinion,  what I think is a fair pro and con for both Romney and McCain. Though I have no doubt that on economic policy, Romney is superior in his acumen and expertise, I still think the GOP nomination is going to encompass faith in more. Mort Kondracke (I believe) stated on Fox News Tuesday evening that the Republican base may have moved more to the center in this race and Romney may run out of "the base" to win the states he needs. It could also be that Huckabee is soaking up enough of the base to hurt Romney. It could also be, I suppose, that enough evangelicals, especially veterans, are voting on national security alone. 

In an event, I think, however you want to define the reasoning, that McCain wins. And the most over riding factor is probably not who has expertise in one area over another, but who can win in November. 

Just my thoughts.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/02/the_mccain_calculus.html

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,</p>
<p>First let me say that I&#8217;m supporting McCain. I think this link below to an article from the WSJ through RCP is the best summary as to why he is best in a race against the Democratic nominee. </p>
<p>It gives, in my opinion,  what I think is a fair pro and con for both Romney and McCain. Though I have no doubt that on economic policy, Romney is superior in his acumen and expertise, I still think the GOP nomination is going to encompass faith in more. Mort Kondracke (I believe) stated on Fox News Tuesday evening that the Republican base may have moved more to the center in this race and Romney may run out of &#8220;the base&#8221; to win the states he needs. It could also be that Huckabee is soaking up enough of the base to hurt Romney. It could also be, I suppose, that enough evangelicals, especially veterans, are voting on national security alone. </p>
<p>In an event, I think, however you want to define the reasoning, that McCain wins. And the most over riding factor is probably not who has expertise in one area over another, but who can win in November. </p>
<p>Just my thoughts.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/02/the_mccain_calculus.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/02/the_mccain_calculus.html</a></p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volunteer Voters &#187; A Stimulated Corker On The Stimulus</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2008/01/31/corker-and-romney-are-right/#comment-195483</link>
		<dc:creator>Volunteer Voters &#187; A Stimulated Corker On The Stimulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2008/01/31/corker-and-romney-are-right/#comment-195483</guid>
		<description>[...] Nathan Moore: It is indeed a political stimulus package (although not quite as bad as Obama’s tossing of the jingle, and Hillary’s ridiculous subsidies for heating oil), and will likely have little real effect on the economy. What Corker is calling for is akin to what Mitt Romney has already proposed - broad based tax cuts, of both marginal rates and capital gains. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nathan Moore: It is indeed a political stimulus package (although not quite as bad as Obama’s tossing of the jingle, and Hillary’s ridiculous subsidies for heating oil), and will likely have little real effect on the economy. What Corker is calling for is akin to what Mitt Romney has already proposed - broad based tax cuts, of both marginal rates and capital gains. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
