<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama the Swordfish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moorethoughts.com/2008/02/22/obama-the-swordfish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2008/02/22/obama-the-swordfish/</link>
	<description>Conservatism, Freedom, Capitalism</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DeafPulse.com - the one-stop pulse for all Deaf-related news and blogs.</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2008/02/22/obama-the-swordfish/#comment-203470</link>
		<dc:creator>DeafPulse.com - the one-stop pulse for all Deaf-related news and blogs.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2008/02/22/obama-the-swordfish/#comment-203470</guid>
		<description>[...] Minister Gordon Brown's grilling by senior MPs on the Commons liaison committee. (34 clicks)      Obama the SwordfishThe individual responsible for preparing Hillary Clinton for last nightâ€™s ... Rush Off His Meds: Liberals Are â€˜Snakesâ€™ â€˜To Be Defeatedâ€™Rush Limbaugh, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Minister Gordon Brown&#8217;s grilling by senior MPs on the Commons liaison committee. (34 clicks)      Obama the SwordfishThe individual responsible for preparing Hillary Clinton for last nightâ€™s &#8230; Rush Off His Meds: Liberals Are â€˜Snakesâ€™ â€˜To Be Defeatedâ€™Rush Limbaugh, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine (Sarah's sister)</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2008/02/22/obama-the-swordfish/#comment-203452</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine (Sarah's sister)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2008/02/22/obama-the-swordfish/#comment-203452</guid>
		<description>If you want to think in terms of the president as a CEO...
1)  I would argue that Obama has been the head of a pretty darn successful organization for the past year.  He campaigned to win, and that's what he's doing.
2)  Maybe CEO isn't the best definition to follow anyway... Haven't we just been dealing with a president who aimed to run the country like a CEO?  Hm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to think in terms of the president as a CEO&#8230;<br />
1)  I would argue that Obama has been the head of a pretty darn successful organization for the past year.  He campaigned to win, and that&#8217;s what he&#8217;s doing.<br />
2)  Maybe CEO isn&#8217;t the best definition to follow anyway&#8230; Haven&#8217;t we just been dealing with a president who aimed to run the country like a CEO?  Hm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Moore</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2008/02/22/obama-the-swordfish/#comment-203434</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2008/02/22/obama-the-swordfish/#comment-203434</guid>
		<description>Now, now - I'm sure one of them voted "present" on the FISA bill...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, now - I&#8217;m sure one of them voted &#8220;present&#8221; on the FISA bill&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arch</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2008/02/22/obama-the-swordfish/#comment-203432</link>
		<dc:creator>arch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2008/02/22/obama-the-swordfish/#comment-203432</guid>
		<description>Hillary's resume isn't too impressive either.  She was my senator for six years and met not one campaign promise.  She has not sponsored any significant legislation for fear of taking a position.  She voted for the war and for and against funding it.

If you want a peek at her organizational and fiscal management skills, look at her campaign spending - $106M for what?

Neither she nor Obama voted on the FISA bill, a real test of concern for the national security - the primary job of the president.  

If Clinton and Obama submitted their resumes for $100M  company, I would not call either of them for an interview.  How can we even consider these two light weights for the CEO of a $14T GDP nation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary&#8217;s resume isn&#8217;t too impressive either.  She was my senator for six years and met not one campaign promise.  She has not sponsored any significant legislation for fear of taking a position.  She voted for the war and for and against funding it.</p>
<p>If you want a peek at her organizational and fiscal management skills, look at her campaign spending - $106M for what?</p>
<p>Neither she nor Obama voted on the FISA bill, a real test of concern for the national security - the primary job of the president.  </p>
<p>If Clinton and Obama submitted their resumes for $100M  company, I would not call either of them for an interview.  How can we even consider these two light weights for the CEO of a $14T GDP nation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volunteer Voters &#187; The Democratic Debate: Thoughts From The Blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2008/02/22/obama-the-swordfish/#comment-203422</link>
		<dc:creator>Volunteer Voters &#187; The Democratic Debate: Thoughts From The Blogosphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/2008/02/22/obama-the-swordfish/#comment-203422</guid>
		<description>[...] Nathan Moore: Obama did not have a good performance last night, which was what Hillary needed. However, the fact is that neither did she. Last night’s debate could have been an exceptional opportunity for her to demonstrate Barack Obama’s lack of depth and preparation for the presidency. The questions were actually laid out in a way where she would have had the opportunity to do so effectively (and avoid stilted and poorly delivered lines like that xerox “zinger”), but none was forthcoming. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nathan Moore: Obama did not have a good performance last night, which was what Hillary needed. However, the fact is that neither did she. Last night’s debate could have been an exceptional opportunity for her to demonstrate Barack Obama’s lack of depth and preparation for the presidency. The questions were actually laid out in a way where she would have had the opportunity to do so effectively (and avoid stilted and poorly delivered lines like that xerox “zinger”), but none was forthcoming. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
