Nathan Moore's Thoughts
Ich Bin Ein Barack Obama
Charles Krauthammer has an excellent opinion piece in the Washington Post today (which was brought to my attention by one of our most faithful readers in Maryland). Obama’s trip to Europe, billed as a tour-de-force of his foreign policy acumen, comes off rather as a poorly orchestrated attempt to bolster a resume-less candidate
Obama is a three-year senator without a single important legislative achievement to his name, a former Illinois state senator who voted “present” nearly 130 times. As president of the Harvard Law Review, as law professor and as legislator, has he ever produced a single notable piece of scholarship? Written a single memorable article? His most memorable work is a biography of his favorite subject: himself.
Hmm, I’m sure there are plenty of mirrors on the continent. The point is sound, however, not that experience alone makes a good president (Herbert Hoover had ample), but virtually no relevant experience should make Americans wary. In fact, because we cannot breach the threshold of experience, there is no need to talk about accomplishment. Not only is there no track record of journeyman experience, but a rather distinct dearth of accomplishment in the various roles he has assumed, from law school to his “present” status as Senator from Illinois.
However, he has accomplished an improbable feat in the sheer existence and viability of his candidacy. That, in itself, is a Clintonian accomplishment. But at least Bill Clinton had run a government. Obama is not BIll Clinton. He is more, well – Seinfeldian , which properly compliments the incessant whining.

















July 19th, 2008 at 8:02 am
True..Some of the only things we know about BO are….
Increased taxes on capital gains affects every retirement account, thus almost all Americans get a tax increase. So, his statement about not taxing the middle and poor class is not true.
A simple google type search shows that he changes his position for expediency, and sometimes within days. Not because a situation changes, because the crowd changes.
No legislation on his part.
Lack of conviction, except to get elected. How many different reponses did he give to his preacher”s antics,I believe it was 4, and even the priest in Chicago? No one can actually believe these rantings were a new thing. This has nothing to do with the preachers, but his judgement is the question here!
So, here we have a man with flipflop opinions, no governing experience, avoids telling the truth to middle class Americans about taxes, with numerous examples of poor judgement, has his only contribution to society is a book about himself that also centers around a nut preacher’s ideals, and he is the candidate from the Dems for what office……?
Something is scary wrong here?