<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain By One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moorethoughts.com/2008/08/04/mccain-by-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2008/08/04/mccain-by-one/</link>
	<description>Conservatism, Freedom, Capitalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:46:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Passion Of The Barack : Post Politics: Political News and Views in Tennessee</title>
		<link>http://moorethoughts.com/2008/08/04/mccain-by-one/comment-page-1/#comment-252919</link>
		<dc:creator>The Passion Of The Barack : Post Politics: Political News and Views in Tennessee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moorethoughts.com/?p=4174#comment-252919</guid>
		<description>[...] Nathan Moore wonders when, if Obama does not begin to pull further away from Barack Obama in the polls, the media will start to blame the American people for rejecting the Chosen One: This is all very peculiar, as Obama is, supposedly, so great and grand. The next logical progression rests in the “why” - why is someone, who is so broadly adored by the gatekeepers of world journalism, having trouble dispatching the once-maverick John McCain, who by all accounts, has waged a less-than-impressive campaign to this point? The underpinning truth of modern American liberal philosophy, that their existence is justified because the people are too stupid to take care of themselves, offers an answer that we will soon see, blaming the voters for not getting it. One can expect MSNBC and The New York Times to lead that charge (to its credit, The Washington Post has largely taken a more rational view of the Obama candidacy). Everything and anything will be blamed but the Messiah himself. To admit otherwise would be to admit the saviour is a flawed being. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nathan Moore wonders when, if Obama does not begin to pull further away from Barack Obama in the polls, the media will start to blame the American people for rejecting the Chosen One: This is all very peculiar, as Obama is, supposedly, so great and grand. The next logical progression rests in the “why” &#8211; why is someone, who is so broadly adored by the gatekeepers of world journalism, having trouble dispatching the once-maverick John McCain, who by all accounts, has waged a less-than-impressive campaign to this point? The underpinning truth of modern American liberal philosophy, that their existence is justified because the people are too stupid to take care of themselves, offers an answer that we will soon see, blaming the voters for not getting it. One can expect MSNBC and The New York Times to lead that charge (to its credit, The Washington Post has largely taken a more rational view of the Obama candidacy). Everything and anything will be blamed but the Messiah himself. To admit otherwise would be to admit the saviour is a flawed being. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
