MooreThoughts.com

Nathan Moore's Thoughts

No Love for English-Only from the Court of Appeals

I have a one word response to that.

Good.

The “English only” charter amendment is bad, not because the Metropolitan government needs to be speaking in English (it already is), but because it is completely unnecessary. The primary advocates, many of whom I have known for years, are pursuing bad government policy with reckless abandon and it is shameful. The call for a special election, which would cost the taxpayers somewhere in the ballpark of $350,000 for an unnecessary, legally irresponsible amendment, is absurd. The money Metro would be spending could just as well go to more accessible English as a second language classes, which would go further toward solving the perceived linguistic problems of our city than this silly amendment.

As Davidson County Republican Party chairman Tom Lawless noted in The Tennessean today, “What is the great immediacy of this?”. He is certainly right - there is no immediacy, especially not in the case of this poorly contrived law.

I tend to look for the best in people, and will give most the benefit of many doubts, but I truly cannot figure out what positive is being accomplished with this amendment.  The state of the law will not change. The only outcome will be that costs to Metro will go up in the form of litigation from certain constitutional challenges.

There is no language crisis in our city. Immigrants are not “holding out” on us, refusing to speak in anything but their native tongues. No one comes to America (and more specifically, Nashville), not wanting to learn English. There is not some underground society on Nolensville Road that has pledged to speak Spanish or die.

But what does need to die is the English-Only charter amendment. It is giving conservatives in Metro an awful reputation, one that many of us do not deserve and strenuously resent. I strongly oppose the English-Only charter amendment and urge its backers to rethink their reasons for supporting it. Surely we can focus on something that would actually make Metro better, leaving the coarsely developed aura of this irrational xenophobia in the gutter where it truly belongs.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • description
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • Blogosphere News

4 Responses to “No Love for English-Only from the Court of Appeals”

  1. Catherine (Sarah's sister) Says:

    Wow - a post of yours I agree with. Hm.

  2. Rick Says:

    Correct… This type of law is simply “ego” driven, not by any type of reason or logic. People do what they need to do to survive, including learning English if needed.

  3. Jim Says:

    The issue is whether 10,000+ voters should be allowed to have a vote on a properly filed amendment petition. It should scare everyone when our local politicans reinterpret the law to prevent the people from exetcing their. The additional costs of voting on November 4th is zero. The voters put it on Nov. 4th to SAVE MONEY. The costs of a sepecial election is $350,000+. Thank the Election Commission for, once again, costing the city $100,000’s of dollars for no good reason.
    Whether the amendment is a good idea or not is for the people, not the government to decide. Surely we can all agree that deciding this question for FREE is better than costing the city a lot of money. Maybe not…

  4. MooreThoughts » Read My Nashville English Only Lips - Give Me $500k Says:

    [...] rationale for pushing for this charter amendment, either substantively (which I have discussed before) or procedurally, can be taken from a conservative political philosophy. It is too late to [...]